Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Rust seems like a nice systems language, but is it really best suited for non-system programming? I may be too risk adverse, but it seems too early to make that bet at this point.


I'm learning Rust by writing a toy compiler, definitely a high-level task, and I'm finding that Rust is pretty good for that. Some highlights:

- Algebraic datatypes and pattern matching: extremely nice for compiler work where you need to manipulate symbol data.

- Result + try! macro: a bit more verbose than a language that can let an exception bubble up, but definitely nicer than the boiler-plate that people in Go must use.

- Module system: easy to expose only what you want.

- Cargo: one of the best, maybe the best, language package manager that I've used. Super easy to add dependencies to your project.

I will say this however: I'm moving more slowly than I would in a language like OCaml. I still haven't assimilated all of the borrow checker rules in my programming sub-conciousness, so I still make errors and it can take a little while to figure out what's happening and how best to address the problem.


Works fine for the web needs.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: