Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It also presents Google’s answer, which was

> that Attia gave Google rights to his technology “without a condition of later payment.”

They admit they did it, but claim they were in the right to do it.



So it devotes one article to one side, and six words (a quote of a quote) to the other side. That doesn't seem very even handed. News outlets profit when people get outraged; why would you trust this one to be disinterested?


Could that mean that the condition was immediate payment? (Salary,bonus, stock, ...)


Or it could have been that he only gets paid if that very specific project would make profit, etc.

There’s many way to write such a contract.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: