There's not much detail about the order, but it seems reasonable to me. Don't interpret code strictly as the bits, but possibly as media. I think that's a reasonable interpretation, unless you're the kind of person who makes corrections like "it's not a movie, it's a DVD containing a movie".

"Defendant gave the code to person X. He should get it back." Here, "the code" could reasonably be a USB stick, a printout, or whatnot. If the request didn't make clear it was distributed over the internet, why would the order?