Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Its only competitive tech company" is a bit of an exaggeration. St (chips), nokiaEricsson, arm (maybe before being bought by Softbank...)


Given NOKIA hosted Qt that was the only reasonable alternative to Java in Mobile, and the only threatening tech, it indeed was the only relevant European tech company. I met Haavard Nord at Googleplex just before he sold Qt to NOKIA and Google was in the play as well. Had Google acquired Qt, Android could have been Qt-based instead.


Well, okayish if by "tech" you mean mobile-internet-client-side software tech (Maybe, I don't work in it anymore).

Technology also applies for vastly broader fields (which I wont enumerate here).


Nokia never was a 'tech' company in the sense we attribute the term nowadays. Their core expertise was in the areas that are now handled by an integrated Asian logistics and manufacturing network available to all.

The mobile handset is only one part of the multiplicity that creates the mighty FAANG product and service portfolio and Nokia never had strong offerings in most of them.


> Nokia never was a 'tech' company in the sense we attribute the term nowadays.

In what sense? By the size alone, off course you can't compare it to the american and asian mega companies. The ambition to be a european mobile tech leader was still around in the mid 2000s. At least in Europe Nokia arguably had one of the most dedicated customer crowds in the handheld devices category. To piss all that away in one move left a big stain...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: