The problem with "must have product in the market" is the same as with the idea of fixing the domain name system by adding a requirement of "use it or lose it".
Who gets to decide what "having a product in the market" means?
It's impossible to generalize this to an objective set of rules. Thus we'd soon be back on square 1 (read: in the court room).
Who gets to decide what "having a product in the market" means?
It's impossible to generalize this to an objective set of rules. Thus we'd soon be back on square 1 (read: in the court room).