Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Depends on how memory/storage intensive the tasks where: "26.7TB of RAM and 2PB (petabytes) of disk space. "

One advantage of going with Amazon, is their really high-speed and voluminous ephemeral storage available per instance in addition to your EBS backed root volume.



Amazon have GPU-based instances available - giving the customer the combination of GPU processing and the large RAM/backing store resources.


They sounded completely CPU-bound from the blog post. They went with "high-CPU" c1.xlarge instances that had modest RAM and storage specs. They gave no details and expressed no concerns whatsoever about RAM or storage bottlenecks.

http://blog.cyclecomputing.com/2011/09/new-cyclecloud-cluste...


One way to find out - I posted a comment on that blog. We'll see if we get an answer.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: