Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Big difference between refusing payout because of expired ITV and this installation.

If you alter your car its electrical harnas wiring and this creates a short somewhere, resulting in your car burning down ... that is a whole difference situation then missing a mandatory inspection. One is deliberate alteration of a vehicle and one is a inspection of condition.

Most insurances have a lot of protective language (for the insurance company), that often comes down to "everything needs to be code compliant/manufacture original/...".

The bigger the damage, the bigger the chance that insurance companies will fight you. If the above mentioned installation creates a small kitchen fire that cost a few 1000 bucks, they probably are not going to fight it.

But what happens if the above mentioned installation burns down the building, kills 5 people... Do not forget that the other neighbors / building owner's insurance companies, will go after your insurance if you are identified as the cause.

The issue is that if you go to court, and a fire comes from your apartment is from a accident, or a state like this, courts are willing to side with the victim party. But if a fire is the result of your own "tampering" with devices, electrical, etc, there is a very, VERY high chance that the court will side with the insurance provider. Insurances are not blank "do whatever you want, you get coverage" type of deals.



Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: