if you had the information to do the task perfectly then those open models shoul...

digitaltrees · 2026-06-22T23:33:07 1782171187

Yah that's my point.

wahnfrieden · 2026-06-22T23:39:10 1782171550

Maybe write “I don’t think I need them. The models we have are good enough for me.” instead then

digitaltrees · 2026-06-23T19:14:53 1782242093

What do you think I am arguing?

wahnfrieden · 2026-06-23T19:49:30 1782244170

That we don't need better models because they're good enough for our work

digitaltrees · 2026-06-24T02:58:16 1782269896

I understand why you drew that conclusion from my post, but that's not what I am arguing in the context of this thread.

The OP said "as soon as an open source model of the capability of fable or gpt5.5 are released it's over because the world will build on top of them" which I took to mean some amazing new level of performance is only able to be unlocked with those models.

I am arguing that the level of performance the OP seems to imply doesn't require fablw level models for the work the OP envisions because the harnesses can actually drive the same performance increase.

There are a few papers that have demonstrated it. And my own use of fable made me feel it was not that big of a jump from opus 4.8 compared to better systems around it.

Its a subtle but important distinction.